In ‘Shameless’ a lot of medium close-ups are used on Frank
and Monica. These shots allow the audience to see the character’s facial
expressions and these expressions are mostly baffled. This emphasises the point
that the working class are supposedly unintelligent and they are made to seem
as a laughing stock as they exaggerate their confused faces. Additionally, these shots linger on and this
shows that the characters are thinking and it takes a long time for them to
pick up on things. This adds to the point that the working class are unable to
think properly and they need time to figure things out. In contrast when the
doctor is speaking the shots quickly cut away from her. This connotes that she
is a fast thinker and can easily come to a conclusion. This shows that the
middle class are more intelligent as they were able to get an education and
work in a well-respected job. The doctor however also has a medium close up
shot however this is used to its advantage as the audience can see her facial
expressions are very confident. This portrays that as well as the middle class
being intelligent, they are confident and well presented. There are a lot of
high angle shots when the working class people are speaking, so this connotes
that they are often looked down upon. This powerful shot also emphasises the
fact that the working class are not worth a lot and they don’t deserve to be
treated as a normal person. It’s almost as if you are looking down on an animal
like a dog for example because they are smaller and weaker than you. In
contrast when the doctors are talking there is a low angle shot, so this shows
that they have more authority and are considered a higher class because they
are smarter and have a better job. This difference is shown very obviously just
within the camera angles.
Most of the clip I watched had an overall fast pace. The
shots mostly cut quickly so you can see all the different characters speaking.
This is effective it keeps the audience interested and involved as they also
feel as if they are they are there and witnessing their faces whilst speaking.
However as I mentioned earlier some of the shots linger, this makes the pace of
the show slow for those brief seconds however it has a big impact because as
the characters are thinking the audience has a chance to take everything in and
maybe even analyse the character more and form a judgement for example on what
a typical working class person would look, sound like or even think like. Usually
these judgements are stereotypical which is specific to what the producers are
aiming to put across in the first place. Shameless also cuts scenes a lot and
also doesn’t stay on one scene for too long and there are transitions to new
settings and characters to show the other stories. These separate scenes
usually result in the two different stories colliding. This is good because the
stories come together and you could see either a contrast on the different
classes or how the different social classes affect each other.
In Shameless, there is mostly diegetic sound. This could be
due to the fact the producers want the audience to focus on the dialogue of the
characters. However there are moments where non-diegetic sounds are used to add
a comical feel. For example, there is a moment where Frank and Monica are
supposedly set a challenge from their baby and there is Native American music
in the background. This links to class because the audience automatically finds
that funny and it’s almost as if they are laughing at these people directly and
the working class in general. Also the way, in which the working class
characters speak, they usually end on a higher note so it’s like they are
asking questions every time. This links back to class because it’s making the
characters seem as if they are unsure in what they are talking about when they
are speaking, thus lowering their intelligence.
Shameless uses a wide variety of mis-en-scene. The first way
in which this does this is by the way Frank is portrayed. His hair looks greasy
and messy most of the time and this shows that he doesn’t look after himself.
This falsely puts the idea that working class people are untidy and look like a
mess either because they don’t care or they don’t have sufficient funds. His
beard is also scruffy and this doesn’t look very pleasant. It connotes that all
working class people mostly look like homeless people who don’t even look at
themselves in the mirror. Most of the working class characters have bags
underneath their eyes and this shows that they are tired. It reminds the
audience that the working class have to work countless hours and they probably
don’t get that much sleep.
Props are really important as Frank is usually seen holding
a cigarette and a person who smokes is usually presented as laid back. This is
quite a contrast to my point before on working class people being hard working
people because this is a view that working class people are often laid back and
lazy which is why they are stuck in the working class.
In the video clip the lighting for when the working class
people were at home was quite dim and natural light was mostly used. This could
show that a working class home isn’t very bright and happy and in fact it’s
quite dark and gloomy. In contrast when everyone is at the hospital there is
very bright lighting and everything is clear and in the light. This could show
that in a hospital there are ‘bright’ people and it has a ‘heavenly’ feel. This
relates to the people who work in the hospital as middle class people are how
they are more pleasant people in general just because they have a better job.
No comments:
Post a Comment